The conservative justices on the Supreme Court appear to be skeptical of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) use of in-house tribunals to adjudicate certain securities disputes. During the recent oral argument of the case, SEC v. Lucia, Justice Anthony Kennedy expressed concern about the tribunal’s power and Justice Samuel Alito asked whether this type of tribunal can truly be considered independent. Chief Justice John Roberts echoed similar concerns, asking whether allowing such tribunals to operate could risk putting the SEC “in a position of putting its thumb on the scale.” The justices also discussed whether the SEC has an incentive to hold hearings in-house rather than in federal courts in order to obtain more favorable outcomes. It remains to be seen what the justices will decide in this case.
Related Articles
John Fetterman would be particularly hard to body-double
. He is 6 foot 8 inches tall and very distinctive with his tattoos, bald head and facial piercings. He would be very difficult to find a convincing body double for as there are few individuals who look the same as him.
The strengths and weaknesses of legal attempts to disqualify Trump
Strengths: 1. Legal challenges to Trump’s candidacy can provide a formal, independent forum to assess and adjudicate issues around his fitness for the presidency. 2. Legal argumentation and evidence has the potential to establish standards for disqualifying those unfit to lead: those with serious moral lapses, those who lack the mental or intellectual capacity, those […]
House Majority Leader Steve Scalise diagnosed with blood cancer
after baseball practice shooting On Wednesday, 7/27/17, House Majority Leader Steve Scalise (R-LA) revealed that he has been diagnosed with a form of blood cancer called “hematopoietic stem cell transplant,” or HSCT, shortly after being critically injured in a shooting at a congressional baseball practice in June of 2017. Scalise had previously been said to […]